Codes and Oaths
January 2006
Elected and appointed public officials typically express a very positive
attitude toward codes of ethics. The conventional wisdom is that codes have a
positive influence in governance, especially in deterring unethical acts by
ethically motivated public servants. That is, unethical officials are likely to
be unethical regardless of whether a code exists but those who want to be
ethical find a code helpful. Of course, the motivation for adopting a code is
often the result of unethical behavior or scandal in the organization.
Oaths are also employed in some jurisdictions to encourage
ethical behavior. Here is an example of an oath that one local government
requires its employees to sign.
I do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States
and the Constitution of the State of ________, and faithfully discharge the
duties of ___________________ , and to abide by and adhere to the provisions of
the Code of Ethics of the Government of __________________. So help me God.
Hard evidence that either codes or oaths either encourage ethical behavior or
discourage unethical behavior is sparse. Nonetheless, many administrators
believe that codes and oaths contribute significantly to an ethical workplace.
Some managers even require their subordinates to sign their professional code
and hang it on their office wall.
A few years ago ASPA debated the wisdom of requiring new
members to sign the membership application indicating that “I support the ASPA
Code of Ethics and will abide by its principles.” National Council rejected this
pledge and opted for an optional check off on the application form stating that
“I have read and agree with ASPA’s Code of Ethics.” Do you agree with this
policy? Should renewing members pledge to uphold the Code? As a top manager,
would you require lower level managers to sign and put on public display their
professional code or oath? Why or why not?