Trusting Employees--should you or shouldn't you?
August 2004
Small businesses lost in 2002 an average $127,000 to fraud and embezzlement by
employees with a total impact estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars a
year. And the problem, according to the Association of Certified Fraud
Examiners, is getting worse. Why? What's happening in the small business world?
Are there a million little Enron's out there? One answer is
straightforward--small businesses must place their trust in employees (often
only one employee handles the financial books) far more heavily than big
businesses. A small business owner simply must pay more attention to the work at
the grass roots level and growing the business into a profitable enterprise.
Consider the case of a small businessman in Kansas who saw no reason to doubt
the integrity of his bookkeeper of 12 years. While the bookkeeper was on
vacation, the owner received a bill from the medical insurer saying that a
$3,000 monthly premium was overdue. A check of the records indicated the bill
had been paid. Further investigation of the company's books showed that other
checks had been used to pay $10,000 in credit card charges -- the company owned
no credit cards.
The bottom line -- the FBI determined that the bookkeeper had stolen more than
$248,000. The bookkeeper was sentenced to18 months in prison and ordered to make
a complete restitution of the funds. The owner says that he has received $1,000
but doesn't expect to receive more. In the meantime, the business is in a
financially precarious position with the owner having to lay off three workers
and delaying his retirement by 7-10 years.
The message here is that trust and opportunity, especially the opportunity to
take advantage of the trust bestowed upon one in small organizations, can result
in personal and organizational trauma. What would you do to strike the balance
between trusting and not-trusting your employees? Is this something we should be
concerned about in small public or non-profit agencies?
Source: Based on story in New York Times, May 6, 2004:C-6.